Cybersex, internet sex, online sex, phone sex, sex chat rooms, and many other variations of terms and names exist, but they are all talking about pretty much the same thing. And that is little different than the older ‘technology’ of peep shows, "men's" magazines, and the like. All of them are variations on a theme, and the Jewish answers are closely related to those concerning porn films and live sex shows.
[On the Jewish Values Online website, search for ‘internet sex’ or ‘cheating’, or look in the category ‘Sexuality’ and sub-category ‘Adultery’ for various questions and answers that have been submitted and answered concerning this topic.]
Essentially, there are several parameters that need to be examined to respond to this question.
- Is there only one person involved, or are there two (or more)?
A. If the person is a single adult not in any sort of relationship, and is reading materials or viewing content of a sexual nature that is arousing to them, there is no direct exchange or sexual interaction. This might be considered as being similar to fantasizing, which is permissible.
B. However, even in this situation, with materials there is the added concern that there is some form of interaction with others, in that someone wrote those materials, and more so, in images, someone posed for and/or took the photographs or video; there is no direct interaction, but this can still be seen as exploitative, and use of these items may be without real consent on the part of the depicted individual(s) [the leaked sex tapes of celebrities, as an example]. Consequently, this is a gray area; it is not clear that this can ever really be said to be fully permissible, because it is impossible to gain real consent.
-
Are the parties to this interchange in a position to be involved in this way?
A. If the persons are both unmarried adults who consent, it is one thing.
B. However, if one or both of the parties is married (to someone other than the other party to this exchange), then this behavior is wrong.
-
Are the parties able to meaningfully consent to such an exchange?
A. Any such exchanges involving children or minors are utterly wrong (as well as illegal).
B. Similarly, this is wrong for any relationship where there is coercion or force (an employer-employee or supervisor-worker situation, for example), or if the exchange is unwanted on the part of either party.
-
Is this exchange between parties that are in or could develop a meaningful legitimate sexual relationship?
A. If the two persons are not eligible to each other (blood relatives, for example), then this exchange is wrong.
B. If these are complete strangers engaging in this exchange, people
who have never met and have no intention or likelihood of any further interactions, this is not a meaningful legitimate relationship, and is wrong because it is simply using another as an object to satisfy oneself.
C. On the other hand, if a committed couple or a married couple
choose to engage in such exchanges with each other, it would seem to be permissible, if both participate willingly, under the concept that this may enhance their communication, and increase their sexual satisfaction with each other.
The conclusion would seem to be that according to Jewish thought and Halachah (law) such behaviors are wrong in most instances, and only allowed and appropriate within the context of a meaningful legitimate committed relationship, and only with real consent and agreement of the parties involved.
Rabbi Joe Blair
Answered by: Rabbi Joseph Blair